Kairos Blog

Along for the Journey, on God's Time...

  • Home
  • About Kairosblog
  • Links
  • Sermons
  • About Chad
You are here: Home / politics / The “Frequent-Churchgoing” voter…

The “Frequent-Churchgoing” voter…

October 14, 2006 by Chad Herring 2 Comments

A few weeks ago I remarked on a Michael Kruse post and offered one dissection of the term “mainstream churchgoer” found in a Christian Century article to which he linked.

I don’t doubt that a large segment of the most consistent churchgoers are indeed of a conservative bent. In fact, in the US studies show that the more frequently one attends church, the more conservative one tends to be. But my point there was that these studies discount the religiosity of many a devout liberal or moderate church member, who even though they aren’t weekly attendants, they go two or three times a month. Its just not right to discount them as not members of “the mainstream”. And pundits and analysts miss something if they don’t see that behind the avid-weekly-republican crowd there’s an avid-almost-weekly-democratic one (with the obvious caveat that there are liberals in the former group and conservatives in the latter). Personally, I prefer the sort of analysis that breaks down various religious communities into traditionalist, centrist, and modernist perspectives, such as this one from 2001 in First Things.

All this has been swirling in my head these past weeks as polling organizations and those who blog mainly on political affairs note the auspicious numbers for democrats a month before the general elections. There was some media discussion several months ago about whether the Catholic vote was swinging back towards the democrats (but note that First Things article, which showed how in 2000 the modernist Catholic vote was Gore’s most reliable). This is around the time that the Religious Left was making a big push to be more prominent in the national political and media scene.

This week the Gallop Poll produced a fascinating piece that, if it is accurate, paints a bleak picture for the Republican party in November. From the precis:

The loss of support for Republican House candidates shown in the latest USA Today/Gallup Poll occurred disproportionately among religious white voters as opposed to less religious whites and nonwhites. At this point, religious whites are equally as likely to say they will vote Democratic as Republican, a marked change from their strong tilt toward the Republicans in surveys conducted June through September.

In this piece, Gallup is using that tested method for the most-frequent-churchgoers, that is, those who have been consistent supporters of the republican party over the past several years. The upshot: not only do the democrats have the support of those “less-frequent churchgoers” and non-churchgoers, but they’re getting more support from the most frequent churchgoers as well.

Here’s the recent polling in graphical format (the first for a generic “democratic candidate”, the second for the congressional race; note the former is pure percent of support, the second is the difference of democratic support minus republican support):

The long and the short of it is that these “frequent-churchgoing” voters are telling pollsters that they are now as likely to vote for a democratic candidate as they are a republican one.

Polls are polls, and what matters is the actual vote, but things look bleak for the national republican party. And, frankly, given what’s gone on with their recent blank-check-to-torture those under US custody and the Foley scandal, I’m not sure it should be any different.

More analysis at Washington Monthly.

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: politics Tagged With: politics

Comments

  1. Michael Kruse says

    October 14, 2006 at 9:20 am

    Great post!

    “…more frequently one attends church, the more conservative one tends to be.”

    And the big question here is cause and effect. Are conservatives more likely to attend church because the “conserve” institutions or are people more like to become conservative if the become Christians. I think there is some of both but I suspect the first is stronger.

    I am with you. I think the GOP could be in for some hard times this election. However, taking a longer view I question the Dems ability to sustain a majority. I think there are a number of more conservative types who are completely disgusted the GOP who will vote Dem or not vote at all. That isn’t a basis for the Dems sustaining a majority. I have the sense that the Dems are floundering for a direction more than the GOP is. You can sustain a majority without a clear vision.

    There was a poster years ago the had 100s of little chicks milling about in some farm pen. The caption at the bottom read “Will somebody please lead …follow…get out of the way… do something!!!” Sort of my take on politics right now.

    Reply
  2. kairos says

    October 14, 2006 at 10:18 am

    Hey, thanks!

    We’ve debated this topic before (for which I am glad and grateful). I’m not sure that the dems are putting together a more unified message or not, and I’m not sure I agree with you that that message of leadership isn’t there. I just think its muted or not strongly presented. On the other hand, the republican party (heretofore) has been far more unified in general than the democrats. A bigger tent leads to more voices, and sometimes a more muddled vision. That doesn’t mean that occasionally those picked from that soup to lead themselves can’t (or don’t) offer a compelling vision that most of the dems and in fact the country could endorse. Bill Clinton was a great example of this. Will someone like him emerge in 08. Who knows?

    But I also can see a splintering of the republicans after this election, with religious right elements fighting with fiscal conservatives and libertarian elements. A unified message may not be extant in the republican party after 2006. We’ll have to see. Its all prognostication, anyway.

    Thanks for the comment!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Chad Andrew Herring

Chad Herring

kairos :: creature of dust :: child of God :: husband of 20 years :: father of 2 :: teaching elder/minister of word and sacrament in the presbyterian church (u.s.a.) :: exploring a progressive-reformed – emergent-christianity :: more

The Dream Team

While kairosblog has an extensive blogroll, the following are particularly meaningful to me, and are commended for your edification:

landonwhitsitt, Landon, SOMA Synod Exec
yorocko, the inimitable Rocky Supinger
a church for starving artists, Jan Edmiston's blog
glass overflowing, Marci Glass's incredible writing, fellow pastor and friend
Bruce Reyes-Chow, former pcusa moderator
Carol Howard Merritt, tribal church
Adam Walker Cleaveland, pomomusings

Kairos Tags

Add new tag advent america Andrew Sullivan bible blogging blogs church church life CSArtists Current Affairs Driscoll ECUSA emergent ethics evangelical evangelism faith fundamentalism global affairs grace health homosexuality humanity lent marriage media ministry Music NPHamlet PCUSA personal politics prayer Religion RLP Rob Bell Science scripture silliness/humor social justice theology Torture voting war and peace

Subscribe to Kairosblog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Archives

Miscellany

© 2019 Chad Andrew Herring

Site banner includes the image "Time"
by Maria Teresa Ambrosi, modification by permission under creative commons license.
Background picture "Chronos" by Brayan Zapata,
used by permission under creative commons license.

Responsibility for content is my own, and not attributable to The Kirk I am fortunate enough to serve or the Presbytery that maintains my ordination, though each keeps me accountable.

Powered by Wordpress, Caffeine, and Luck.
Get the Genesis Framework for wordpress, it rocks!

Copyright © 2021 · Metro Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.